检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:闵容[1,2] 胡竹菁[1] Min Rong;Hu Zhujing(School of Psychology,Jiangxi Normal University,Nanchang 330022;Mental Health and Consultation Center,Guangdong University of Technology,Guangzhou 510006)
机构地区:[1]江西师范大学心理学院,南昌330022 [2]广东工业大学心理健康教育与咨询中心,广州510006
出 处:《心理学探新》2020年第3期214-220,共7页Psychological Exploration
基 金:国家自然科学基金(31460252)。
摘 要:通过两个实验探讨了时间压力对类比推理的直觉加工的影响。实验1采用三因素混合实验设计,以48名大学生为被试,在不同时间压力条件下对不同相似性言语类比推理题进行喜好度判断和类比推理逻辑判断。实验2是在实验1的基础上用图形类比推理题代替语义类比推理题,以56名大学生为被试。结果发现:(1)时间压力下,对跨领域言语类比推理的直觉加工效应显著高于逻辑加工效应;(2)时间压力下,低难度图形类比推理题的直觉加工效应显著高于逻辑加工效应。无时间压力条件下,图形类比推理的逻辑加工效应优势明显;(3)时间压力对类比推理的直觉加工和逻辑加工均有影响。The present study conducted two experiments to explore the influence of time pressure on analogical reasoning intuitive.Experiment 1 used three factors mixture design and asked 48 participants to judge the semantic propositional analogy problems with a paradigm of preference judgment,compared its responses to time pressure and similarity with explicit processes.Experiment 2 replaced semantic propositional analogy problems with figures analogical problems and asked 56 participants to judge the items.The results showed:(1)Under the time pressure,the accuracy rate of intuitive logic on corss-domain similarity items was mostly higher than that of controlled logic;(2)Under the time pressure,the accuracy rate of intuitive logic on low difficult items was higher than that of controlled logic.Without time pressure,the controlled logic of figures analogy problems has more advantages;(3)Time pressure had a stronger influence on both implicit processes and explicit processes of analogical reasoning.
分 类 号:B842.5[哲学宗教—基础心理学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.141.202.216