中国英语学习者have附缩限制习得:“自然”机制与“使然”机制  

Chinese EFL Learners’Acquisition of the Constraints on Have-cliticisation:Natural Mechanism vs.Nurtural Mechanism

作　　者：韩百敬 曾涛[1] HAN Baijing;ZENG Tao

机构地区：[1]湖南大学外国语学院,湖南长沙410011 [2]长江师范学院大学外语教学部,重庆408100

出　　处：《外语与外语教学》2020年第3期64-71,148,共9页Foreign Languages and Their Teaching

基　　金：国家社科基金一般项目“中国英语学习者句法-语义接口结构的认知加工机制研究”(项目编号:19BYY079);重庆市教委人文社科一般项目“‘动词-结构’双向互动视角下句法表征与发展研究”(项目编号:19SKGH178)的资助。

摘　　要：各种句法结构中have附缩的合法性都取决于have是否为深层句法层级中的功能范畴T,但中国英语学习者拥有的使用经验却各不相同。本研究通过语法判断任务调查了中国英语学习者对have附缩限制的习得情况,并探讨了“自然”和“使然”两大语言可学性机制在外语句法习得中的作用。结果显示习得以“自然”性机制为主,“使然”性机制为辅,后者的作用仅当线性序列中存在显性提示时才能得到有效发挥。在同一语言现象中对两种不同机制的对比分析对外语句法可学性研究具有一定的启示意义。The grammaticality of all the have-cliticisation in various syntactic structures relies on w hether have is the functional category of T in the deep syntactic hierarchy. Nevertheless,its usage experience available to Chinese EFL learners varies from case to case. Using a grammaticality judgment task,the present study investigates Chinese EFL learners’ acquisition of the constraints on have-cliticisation and explores the effects of the natural and the nurtural mechanisms of language learnability on L2 syntactic acquisition. It is revealed that the acquisition is dominated by the natural mechanism and supplemented by the nurtural mechanism w hich only w orks w ell w ith explicit markers in linear sequences. The comparative analysis of the tw o different acquisition mechanisms w ithin the same linguistic phenomenon enlightens the research of L2 syntactic learnability.

关 键 词：have附缩限制 “自然”机制 “使然”机制 

分 类 号：H0[语言文字—语言学]