世界银行“办理破产”指标与我国的应对思路——以“破产框架力度指数”为视角  

The World Bank’s Resolving Insolvency Index and the Countermeasures of China:From the Perspective of Strength of Insolvency Framework Index

作　　者：韩长印[1] Han Changyin

机构地区：[1]上海交通大学凯原法学院,上海222242

出　　处：《法学杂志》2020年第7期1-13,共13页Law Science Magazine

摘　　要：世界银行建立了包括抵押品止赎制度、绝对顺位规则、债权人控制权制度以及破产程序的时间、花费、持续经营指数在内的一系列衡量指标来判断一个经济体"办理破产"能力的强弱。我国尽管在2019年初通过发布司法解释的方式补充和完善了相关评价指标,但因出台时间仓促,加之几项重要的制度性规则仍停留在《企业破产法》的立法层面,导致我国仍有多项失分。我国的应对措施应当包括:当前在司法解释层面尝试债权人会议推荐管理人的做法,重视债权人会议对管理人工作绩效的评价;未来在破产法修改层面落实债权人会议对管理人的直接选任权。The World Bank has established a series of measurement indicators to judge an economy’s ability of Resolving Insolvency,including the foreclosure system,absolute priority rules,creditor control system,and the time,cost,and going concern operation index of the insolvency process.Although China has supplemented and improved relevant judgment indicators through judicial interpretation in early 2019,due to the hasty time and several important institutional rules remain at the legislative level of the Enterprise Bankruptcy Law,many failures were happened in China economy.The countermeasures in current situation shall be exploring the recommendation of the administrator in creditor’s meeting by way of judicial interpretation,as well as emphasizing the creditor’s evaluation of the administrator’s work performance.As for the future,creditor’s meeting shall be entitled to a more direct electing right of the administrator at the level of bankrupt law modification.

关 键 词：营商环境 办理破产 债务执行 破产框架力度指数 破产回收率 

分 类 号：D922.291.92[政治法律—经济法学]