英美侵权法之可预见性理论于因果关系认定的优越性——以法律因果关系为视角  

The Superiority of Predictability to Causation Cognizance in Anglo-American Tort Law--From the Perspective of Legal Causation

作　　者：陈若冰 王雪琪 CHEN Ruo-bing;WANG Xue-qi(School of Humanities and Law,Guizhou University of Finance and Economics,Guiyang 550025,China)

机构地区：[1]贵州财经大学文法学院,贵州贵阳550000

出　　处：《广西政法管理干部学院学报》2020年第3期97-108,共12页Journal of Guangxi Administrative Cadre Institute of Politics and Law

摘　　要："实践意义上的可预见性"与"理论意义上的可预见性"并非只在虑及损害严重程度、避险成本及谨慎之人行为风险因素下加以区分,可预见性标准本身的理论功能及适用领域亦应区辨。可预见性于侵权因果关系认定突显出简单性、一致性及公正性等理论制度的优越性,且制造责任的理由也应限制责任。非严格责任条件下,注意义务之违反及责任范围界定均须考虑预见性;严格责任背景下,可预见性间接限制法律因果关系,限制责任范围之重要性可见一斑。"the practical sense of predictability"and"theory in the sense of predictability"are distinguished not only in the light of the damage severity and risk factors of safety cost and cautious behavior but also theory and applicable areas of the standard of predictability itself.The predictability in infringement shows the superiority of simplicity,consistency and fairness,the reasons for manufacturing responsibility should be limited.The condition of strict liability,breach of a duty of care and responsibility scope must be considered.Under the background of strict liability,the predictability indirectly limits the law causality,which presents the importance of limitation of liability scope.

关 键 词：侵权 可预见性规则 事实上的原因 法律上的原因 

分 类 号：D913[政治法律—民商法学]