检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈飞 布静秋 温伟生 CHEN Fei;BU Jing-qiu;WEN Wei-sheng(Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery,Chinese PLA General Hospital,Beijing 100853,China)
机构地区:[1]中国人民解放军总医院第一医学中心口腔科,北京100853
出 处:《北京口腔医学》2020年第3期153-155,共3页Beijing Journal of Stomatology
摘 要:目的比较三种术式治疗阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停低通气综合征(OSAHS)伴小颌畸形的疗效。方法根据不同的术式将50位患者分为三组,A组:15例悬雍垂腭咽成形术(UPPP),B组:25例UPPP+颏前徙术,C组:10例UPPP+下颌升支矢状劈开前移术+颏前徙术。根据术前、术后睡眠监测各项数据及随访结果,评价其疗效,采用卡方检验对数据进行统计学分析。结果根据测量数据,单纯UPPP成功率为33.3%,UPPP+颏前徙术成功率为84.0%,UPPP+下颌升支矢状劈开前移术+颏前徙术成功率90.0%。UPPP+下颌升支矢状劈开前移术+颏前徙术的疗效优于UPPP+颏前徙术及UPPP术(P<0.05)。结论对于OSAHS伴小颌畸形患者采用UPPP+下颌升支矢状劈开前移术+颏前徙术联合术式疗效最好,应作为此类患者的首选术式。Objective To compare the clinical results of three different methods in the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea hypopnea syndrome(OSAHS).Methods A total of 50 patients with OSAHS were divided into three groups which received different operation,group A(15)uvulopalatopharyngoplasty(UPPP),group B(25)UPPP+chin advancement,group C(10)UPPP+sagittal split ramus osteotomy(SSRO)+chin advancement.The results of the surgery were evaluated by reviewing the pre-and post-operative polysomnography(PSG)parameters.Results The success rate in group A,group B and group C were 33.3%,84.0%and 90.0%,respectively.The effect of group C was better than that of group A and B(P<0.05).Conclusion UPPP+SSRO+chin advancement could be the first choice for OSAHS patients with micrognathia deformity.
关 键 词:阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停低通气综合症 手术治疗 小颌畸形
分 类 号:R766.9[医药卫生—耳鼻咽喉科] R782.2[医药卫生—临床医学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117

