检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张红梅 ZHANG Hongmei
机构地区:[1]上海市交通建设工程管理中心,上海市200120
出 处:《城市道桥与防洪》2020年第7期211-212,M0020,共3页Urban Roads Bridges & Flood Control
摘 要:城镇化公路项目可分别采用市政工程或公路工程计价和建设管理模式,但与工程造价直接相关的造价管理文件、招投标文件、工程量清单等从形式到内容都有所不同。由于市政工程或公路工程计价定额及计价程序的不同,因此即使采用相同的人工、材料、机械台班单价,其工程造价结果也会有所差异。通过城镇化公路项目中部分子目采用市政与公路定额计价定额对比,分析两种定额的计价差异,为今后建立统一计价模式或两种计价模式相互补充借鉴提供一些思路。The urbanization highway projects can adopt the pricing and construction management modes of municipal engineering or highway engineering. But the cost management document, bidding document and bill of quantities directly related to the engineering cost are different from the forms to contents. Due to the difference of the pricing quota and pricing procedure of municipal engineering or highway engineering, even if adopting the same labor, material and mechanical unit price, the result of its engineering cost will be also different. By comparison and analysis of the partial subprojects adopting the municipal and highway pricing quotas in urbanization highway project, the pricing difference between two quotas is analyzed in order to provide some ideas for mutual complementation and reference to build an unified pricing mode or two pricing modes.
分 类 号:U415.13[交通运输工程—道路与铁道工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117