我国长期护理保险制度试点服务项目的比较分析——基于上海、南通、青岛三个城市的比较  

A Comparative Analysis of Pilot Services of Long-term Care Insurance System in China——Based on the comparison between Shanghai,Nantong and Qingdao

作　　者：杨桂彬 谢宏忠[1] YANG Gui-bin;XIE Hong-zhong(School of Public Administration,Fujian Normal University,Fuzhou 350007,China)

机构地区：[1]福建师范大学公共管理学院,福建福州350007

出　　处：《西安建筑科技大学学报（社会科学版）》2020年第3期35-41,71,共8页Journal of Xi'an University of Architecture & Technology(Social Science Edition)

摘　　要：通过对上海、南通、青岛三个试点城市长期护理保险服务项目的比较分析,得出目前试点城市存在护理服务供给总量不足、服务供给主体单一与盲目定位、服务项目结构不合理、服务内容与保障对象出现错位等问题,及制度定位不统一,低效率与服务序列分割,尚未完全建制、碎片化严重,资源整合度低、部门协调性差,养老服务市场活力不足等原因。在此基础上提出了整合资源、增强服务供给能力,合理定位、促进供给主体多元化,以需定供、形成服务序列清单的建议。Having analyzed comparatively the long-term care insurance services of three pilot cities of Shanghai,Nantong and Qingdao,the paper finds out problems exiting in these cities such as the insufficient total supply of care services,the single acting subject and blind positioning of service supply,the unreasonable structure of services,and the unmatching between service contents and objects of nursing.The causes of these issues are non-uniform positioning of system,inefficiency and service sequence segmentation,not well formed institutions,severe fragementation,lower-degree integration of resources,poor coordination of departments,lack of vitality of the pension service market and so on.On this basis,suggestions are put forward to integrate resources,enhance service supply capacity,promote the diversification of supply subjects with reasonable positioning,and form a service sequence list by determine supply on demand.

关 键 词：长期护理保险 服务项目 比较 

分 类 号：D669.6[政治法律—政治学] F842.6[政治法律—中外政治制度]