检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张程龙 成瑜 谭小勇[1] ZHANG Chenglong;CHENG Yu;TAN Xiaoyong(Sports Law Institute of Shanghai University of Political Science and Law,Shanghai 201701,China)
机构地区:[1]上海政法学院体育法治研究院,上海201701
出 处:《体育科研》2020年第4期8-15,共8页Sport Science Research
基 金:国家体育总局决策咨询研究重点项目(2019-B-20)。
摘 要:自1989年《全国性体育竞赛检查禁用药物的暂行规定》颁布以来,我国政府一直致力于反兴奋剂的立法与实施工作。虽然已取得了良好效果,但主要依靠政府推动迅速建立的反兴奋剂制度在发展过程中必然会面临一些问题。因此本文主要运用文献资料法,从行政法的视角对我国反兴奋剂的法律与制度进行分析,认为当前我国反兴奋剂制度在体制、程序、预防措施、权利保护等方面存在不足或缺失,并从立法、监督机制、听证笔录、行政约谈四个方面提出建议,以期推动我国反兴奋剂制度的进一步完善,并提供研究反兴奋剂领域的新视角。Since the Provisional Regulations on Inspection of Banned Substances in National Sporting Events was issued in 1989,Chinese government has been committed to anti-doping legislation and enforcement.Although great progress has been achieved,the anti-doping system,which is mainly initiated by the government,is bound to face some problems in the process of development.Therefore,this study,mainly uses the method of literature review to analyze the anti-doping law and system in China from the perspective of administrative law.It is held that current anti-doping in China has deficiencies and shortcomings in its system,procedures,preventive measures,rights protection and so on.Therefore,some suggestions are put forward from the four aspects:legislation,supervisory mechanism,hearing transcripts and administrative interview,in order to promote the improvement of China's anti-doping system and offer a new perspective in the field of anti-doping study.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.33