《皇明条法事类纂》成书问题蠡探——以《明代档册》为参照  

On the Compilation of A Collection of Typed Rules and Regulations in the Ming Dynasty:With Reference to The Archives of the Ming Dynasty

作　　者：高寿仙[1] GAO Shou-xian(Journal Editorial Department,Beijing Administration Institute,Beijing 100044,China)

机构地区：[1]北京行政学院校刊编辑部,北京100044

出　　处：《北京联合大学学报（人文社会科学版）》2020年第3期17-27,共11页Journal of Beijing Union University(Humanities and Social Sciences)

摘　　要：《皇明条法事类纂》辑录了成化和弘治年间的大量文书,是研究明代中叶各方面情况的资料宝库。然而关于此书的成书问题,至今仍是一个尚待破解的谜团。收藏于中国第一历史档案馆的《明代档册》,在内容和性质上与《皇明条法事类纂》十分相似,说明两者有着共同的编纂背景和资料来源。《明代档册》的抄录时间非常清楚,肯定不会早于嘉靖十七年,说明嘉靖年间确实存在编纂这类文献的动机和需求;不过其署名“监察御史戴金编次”,尽管限于资料无法证伪,但确实存在可疑之处。现存钞本很可能是晚清时期誊抄成书的,但其内容本身并无疑问。A Collection of Typed Rules and Regulations in the Ming Dynasty records a large number of documents in the years of Chenghua and Hongzhi,which is a treasure house for studying all aspects of the situation in the middle of the Ming Dynasty.However,the completion of this book is still a mystery to be solved.The Archives of the Ming Dynasty,collected in the first historical archives of China,is very similar in content and nature to A Collection of Typed Rules and Regulations in the Ming Dynasty,which shows that they share the same compilation background and data source.The transcription time of The Archives of the Ming Dynasty is very clear,which will certainly not be earlier than the 17th year of Jiajing,indicating that there was indeed a motivation and demand for compiling this kind of literature in Jiajing period;however,its signature“compiled by Investigating Censor Dai Jin”,although limited to the fact that the materials cannot be falsified,is indeed suspicious.The existing version was probably transcribed at the end of the Qing Dynasty,but there is no doubt about their contents.

关 键 词：《皇明条法事类纂》 《明代档册》 《条例全文》 编次时间 

分 类 号：K248[历史地理—历史学]