对国内外训练原则的比较与分析  

Comparison and Analysis on Training Principles in Our Country and Abroad

作　　者：申霖 陈春梅[2] SHEN lin;CHEN Chunmei(College of Physical Education,Guangdong University of Education,Guangzhou 510545,China;Division of Public Infrastructure,Beijing College of Sports,Beijing 100075,China)

机构地区：[1]广东第二师范学院体育学院,广东广州510545 [2]北京体育职业学院公共基础部,北京100075

出　　处：《南京体育学院学报》2020年第5期58-65,共8页Journal of Nanjing Sports Institute

摘　　要：国内外代表性训练学专著中关于训练原则的论述有很多。以中国知网和Web of Science为索引来源,从1979到2019年国内中文体育类期刊和国外英文核心文献合集中,搜索以训练原则为主题的文献成果,从而对国内中文类著作期刊与英文类著作期刊中以训练原则为主题的研究论述进行对比与分析,期望能够通过与国外同主题研究的比较,探索国内在该领域研究工作的不足之处,从而为国内训练学进一步的发展与完善提供借鉴。研究发现:国内外都把训练原则的研究放在重要位置,国内对训练原则的研究以理论推理与归纳为主,而国外偏向于以生物学理论为基础的实证研究;国内对训练原则论述仍是以早期教育学原则为理论框架,以理论的积累式研究促进发展,常以对多个训练实例中成功经验的高度总结寻求一般规律,而国外多以最新的生物学理论成果为依据,以某具体项目为基础对训练原则进行论述;国外训练原则与体育教学原则在应用主体上没有明显区分,而国内则明显把训练原则应用于竞技体育领域。Based on CNKI and Web of Science,searches for the literature with training principles as the subject from 1979 to 2019,and uses the software of CiteSpace 5.6.R2,the paper analyze the result of co-keywords and co-terms in each cluster,compares the characteristics and differences between the domestic and foreign researches on this topic.The research finds that:in the field of physical education and sports training,researcher in our country and abroad all concerned.Domestic research is relatively loose,while the research abroad has a continuous study based on central scholars.Domestic research shows more summary of subjective experience,while the research abroad is more based on the results of basic disciplines.

关 键 词：训练原则 国内外 科学知识图谱 共现分析 

分 类 号：G808.1[文化科学—体育训练]