认真对待理由——关于新兴权利之分类、证成与功能的分析  

Taking Reasons Seriously——Analysis of the Classification, Justification, and Function of Emerging Rights

作　　者：朱振[1,2] ZHU Zhen

机构地区：[1]吉林大学理论法学研究中心,长春130012 [2]吉林大学法学院,长春130012

出　　处：《求是学刊》2020年第2期105-119,共15页Seeking Truth

摘　　要：在实践推理的意义上,法定权利提供了一种排他性理由或决定性理由,而其他性质的权利主张并不具有这一意义上的规范力。这种规范性力量在表面上源自于权利的制度属性,在深层次上来自于社会价值的支撑。辩护新兴权利主要是辩护一项要求可以归属于某个既有基本权利的子集,而在探求一个有价值的要求是否为权利时,我们需要先寻找构成那个基础权利的内在理由,而内在理由的运作方式也和法定权利理由的规范效力关联在一起。此外,价值的社会依赖性决定了其现实化需要通过制度管道,而权利正提供了现代社会几乎最重要的制度管道。价值与权利是互惠的,双方之间不存在单向的决定关系。In the sense of practical reasoning, the legal right provides an exclusive or decisive justification,while the right claims of other nature do not have normative force in this sense. This normative power derives on the surface from the institutional attributes of rights and at a deeper level from the support of social values.The defense of emerging rights is primarily the defense that a claim can be attributed to a subset of a pre-existing fundamental right. When exploring whether a valuable claim is a right, we need to first look for the intrinsic justification that constitutes that fundamental right. Additionally, the intrinsic justification is also linked to the normative validity of the statutory justification of rights. Moreover, the social dependence of values dictates that their realization needs to pass through institutional channels, and rights are providing almost the most critical institutional channel in modern society. Values and rights are reciprocal, and there is no one-way decision relationship between the two parties.

关 键 词：权利 规范性 互惠性 

分 类 号：D910[政治法律—法学]