检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王雪婷 吴张永[1] 恭飞 杜奕 Wang Xueting;Wu Zhangyong;Gong Fei;Du Yi(Faculty of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering,Kunming University of Science and Technology,Kunming City,Yunnan Province 650500,China;City College,Kunming University of Science and Technology,Kunming City,Yunnan Province 650051,China)
机构地区:[1]昆明理工大学机电工程学院,云南省昆明市650500 [2]昆明理工大学城市学院,云南省昆明市650500
出 处:《农业装备与车辆工程》2020年第7期15-19,44,共6页Agricultural Equipment & Vehicle Engineering
基 金:云南省教育厅科学研究基金项目(2015Y080)。
摘 要:为研究纳米水基SiC流体的润滑性,采用表观油膜厚度法对其进行润滑性分析。首先,采用两步法制备出稳定的纳米水基SiC流体,然后,利用表观油膜厚度法将纳米水基SiC与2种新型环保液压介质—淡水和海水进行润滑性分析对比,最后,运用AMEsim软件对表观油膜厚度法的分析结果进行验证。通过建立液压仿真系统,应用以上3种流体作为介质进行系统仿真实验,得出液压缸内3种介质的泄漏量曲线。实验结果表明,纳米水基SiC流体的润滑性优于淡水和海水的润滑性。In order to study the lubricity of nano-water-based SiC fluids,oiliness analysis was carried out using apparent oil film thickness method.Firstly,a stable nano-water-based SiC fluid was prepared by a two-step method.Then,the apparent oil film thickness method was used to compare the lubricity of nano-water-based SiC with two new environmentally friendly hydraulic media,fresh water and seawater.Finally,the AMEsim software was used to compare the table.The analysis results of the oil film thickness method were verified.Through establishing the hydraulic simulation system,the above three fluids were used as the medium for the system simulation experiment,and the leakage curves of the three media in the hydraulic cylinder were obtained.The experimental results show that the lubricity of nano-water-based SiC fluid is better than that of fresh water and seawater.
关 键 词:纳米水基SiC 表观油膜厚度法 液压介质 润滑性
分 类 号:TB34[一般工业技术—材料科学与工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.221.244.218