罪刑法定视域下空白罪状的适用——以盗伐林木罪为例  

The Application of Blank Pleadings from the Perspective of Criminal Law--Taking the Crime of Illegal Logging as an Example

作　　者：成功 CHENG Gong(School of Law and Public Administration,Hunan University of Technology and Business,Changsha,Hunan,410205,China)

机构地区：[1]湖南工商大学法学与公共管理学院,湖南长沙410205

出　　处：《西安石油大学学报（社会科学版）》2020年第4期88-94,共7页Journal of Xi’an Shiyou University:Social Science Edition

摘　　要：罪刑法定原则经历了绝对的罪刑法定向相对的罪刑法定的历史嬗变,此为空白罪状提供了立法契机,但实践中也存在忽视罪名空白性、空洞引用前置性法规等问题。以盗伐林木罪为例进行分析,总结出空白罪状的解释方法与路径,并基于我国的现实情况,对砍伐经济行为的定罪问题从体系解释与法理方面进行考证,得出不宜认定犯罪的结论。The principle of legally prescribed punishment has experienced the historical evolution from the absolute principle to the relative principle.This provides a legislative opportunity for blank counts,but in practice there are also issues such as neglecting the blankness of crimes and liberally quoting the pre-existing regulations.Based on the analysis of the crime of stealing forest trees,the explanation method and path of the blank crime are concluded,and according to the actual situation,the textual research on the conviction of logging non-wood product forest is conducted from aspects of the system interpretation and legal principle basis,making a conclusion that its guilty is not taken for granted.

关 键 词：罪刑法定 空白罪状 盗伐林木罪 体系解释 

分 类 号：D924.3[政治法律—刑法学]