检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张皓[1] ZHANG Hao
出 处:《江苏师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2020年第3期60-79,123,共21页Journal of Jiangsu Normal University:Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition
基 金:北京市社科基金项目“治藏主权的恢复:反对外国干涉下之西藏和平解放研究”(项目编号:17LSB007)阶段性成果。
摘 要:西藏和平解放是中国国家统一的重要一环,印度却企图将西藏变为中印之间"缓冲区"而横加干涉。1950年初噶厦派出代表团取道印度赴京,印度阻拦并要求在新德里谈判,致使代表团直至10月仍未离开印度。人民解放军发起打开西藏和平解放大门的昌都战役,印度却指责是阻止和平谈判。西藏和平解放谈判是大势所趋,印度无力阻拦。在谈判进行时,它虽然承认西藏是中国领土不可分割的一部分,但是反对人民解放军进驻西藏。中国国家统一和驱逐帝国主义侵略势力出西藏,是新中国政府坚定不移的方针,包括印度在内的任何侵略势力阻拦不了西藏和平解放谈判的举行与"十七条协议"的签订,阻拦不了人民解放军进驻喜马拉雅山边防。Tibet peaceful liberation is an important step of the unite of New China,but India tried its best to intervene to turn Tibet into a"buffer area"between China and India.When bkav-shag sent the local delegation to Beijing by the way of India,Indian government intercepted and asked the negotiation to be held in New Delhi so that the delegation couldn’t leave India until October,1950.When the People’s Liberation Army had to launch Qamdo campaign,Indian government criticized the campaign for blocking the peaceful negotiation.Tibet peaceful negotiation was the general trend,which could not be intercepted by Indian government.Indian government recognized that Tibet is a part of Chinese territory at the time of peaceful negotiation,but against the People’s Liberation Army in Tibet.To unite the New China and to expel the imperialist aggression forces from Tibet were the unshakable policy of the New China government,any foreign aggression forces,including India,couldn’t stop holding the Tibet peaceful negotiation and signing"17-article Agreement"and couldn’t stop PLA troops from entering the Himalayan frontier.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15