政府公共权力视域中的城乡融合发展路径研究  

Research on the Development Path of Urban-rural Integration from the Perspective of Administrative Public Power

作　　者：秦清芝 杨雪英 张元 QIN Qing-zhi;YANG Xue-ying;ZHANG Yuan

机构地区：[1]江苏海洋大学马克思主义学院,江苏连云港222005 [2]江苏海洋大学党委宣传部,江苏连云港222005

出　　处：《江苏师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2020年第3期102-112,124,共12页Journal of Jiangsu Normal University：Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition

基　　金：2018年江苏高校哲学社会科学研究重点项目“江苏省三大区域乡村振兴战略实施的路径选择研究”(项目编号:2018SJZDI114);2018-2019年度江苏省连云港市社会科学基金项目“文化生态视阈下的连云港乡村建设高质量发展目标与实现路径研究”(项目编号:19LKT2054)的研究成果。

摘　　要：消除城乡差距,必须依赖城乡融合发展;要实现城乡融合发展,就要实现城乡资源要素的双向自由流动。导致目前资源由乡村向城市单向流动的因素很多,但是政府行政公共权力在乡村的淡出是其关键的机制因素。政府行政公共权力简称政府"公权"。加强政府公权在乡村的到场既是必要的,又具有充分的正当性;既是整个社会健康发展的需要,又是加快乡村自身发展的要求。政府公权在乡村的到场应具有边界,应有明确的实现路径,其与"村民自治"并行不悖。To eliminate the gap between urban and rural areas,we must rely on the integrative development of urban and rural areas;to achieve the integrative development of urban and rural areas,we must realize the two-way free flow of urban and rural resource elements.There are many factors that cause the current one-way flow of resources from the village to the city,but the fade-out of government administrative public power in the countryside is the key mechanism factor.Government administrative public power is called"public power"for short.Strengthening the presence of government administrative power in the countryside is necessary and justified,which is both the need for the healthy development of the entire society and the requirement for the development of the village itself.The presence of administrative public power in the village should have a boundary and a clear path of realization,which is not mutually exclusive with"village self-governance".

关 键 词：政府公权 城乡融合 乡村 要素双向流动 

分 类 号：F32[经济管理—产业经济]