检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:龙鑫玲 陈丕茂[1] 段晓伟 陈佳荣 魏晓 石晶 LONG Xin-ling;CHEN Pi-mao;DUAN Xiao-wei;CHEN Jia-rong;WEI Xiao;SHI Jing(Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs,South China Sea Fisheries Research Institute,Chinese Academy of Fishery Science,Scientifice Observing and Experimental Station of South China Sea Fishery Resources and Environment,Guangzhou 510300,China;Shanghai Ocean University,Shanghai 201306,China;Shenzhen Dapeng New Distriet Economic Service Bureau,Shenzhen 518119,China)
机构地区:[1]农业农村部南海渔业资源环境科学观测实验站,中国水产科学研究院南海水产研究所,广东广州510300 [2]上海海洋大学,上海201306 [3]深圳市大鹏新区经济服务局,广东深圳518119
出 处:《海洋环境科学》2020年第4期576-584,共9页Marine Environmental Science
基 金:国家科技支撑计划课题(2012 BAD18 B02);中国水产科学研究院基本科研业务费专项项目(2016 HY-ZD01);深圳市大鹏新区经济服务局项目(深圳市大鹏新区海岸带资源环境承载力研究)。
摘 要:沙滩是开发滨海旅游业和休闲渔业的重要依托,沙滩质量评价是保护和合理开发利用沙滩的重要依据。根据深圳大鹏半岛沙滩资源环境特点,参考国内外沙滩质量评价研究,构建一套适用于大鹏半岛沙滩质量评价体系,该体系涵盖自然、社会和人文三类要素,包括反映沙滩特征和功能的一级指标2项5大类9个亚类共33个因子,运用层次分析法确定指标权重。将沙滩质量得分划分为优(≥80)、良(70~80)、及格(60~70)、中(50~60)、差(<50)等5个等级。对大鹏半岛53个沙滩质量的评价结果表明,沙滩资源环境质量、沙滩旅游服务质量平均得分分别为68.62、46.88,沙滩资源环境质量评价等级为及格,沙滩旅游服务质量评价等级为差;沙滩综合质量评价为优的沙滩3个、良的沙滩11个、及格的沙滩15个、中的沙滩20个、差的沙滩4个,平均得分63.04,沙滩综合质量评价等级为及格。根据沙滩质量评价情况提出沙滩开发管理建议。Beaches are an important support for the development of coastal tourism and recreational fisheries.Beach quality evaluation is an important basis for the protection and rational development and utilization of beaches. Based on the characteristics of the resources environment of Dapeng peninsula beaches in Shenzhen, a suitable quality evaluation system was constructed for Dapeng peninsula referred to main domestic and overseas quality evaluation systems of beaches. The quality evaluation system covers three elements: nature,society and humanity. To be specific, this system consists of 2 aspects, 5 categories, 9 sub-categories and 33 factors that reflected the characteristics and functions of the beaches. Analytic hierarchy process(AHP) was applied to determining the indicators weight. There are five grades given by the beach quality evaluation system which were excellent beaches(≥80), good beaches(70~ 80), passing beaches(60~ 70), medium beaches(50~60) and poor beaches(<50). The results showed that the average score of beaches quality was 68.62 in resources and environment. The quality of most beaches resources and environment was pass level. The average score of beaches tourism service quality was 46.88. The quality of beaches tourism service was poor. The quality was evaluated as 3 excellent beaches, 11 good beaches, 15 passing beaches, 20 medium beaches and 4 poor beaches. The comprehensive quality evaluation level of the beach was passing. According to the evaluation of beaches quality, beaches development and management suggestion was proposed.
分 类 号:X802.2[环境科学与工程—环境工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15