检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:潘海燕 柳志[1] 程振源[2] 韦夏菲 Pan Haiyan;Liu Zhi;Cheng Zhenyuan;Wei Xiafei(School of Accounting,Hunan Vocational College of Commerce,Changsha 410205,China;School of Economics&Management,South China Normal University,Guangzhou 510006,China;Shenzhen Tax Service,State Taxation Administration,Shenzhen Guangdong 518000,China)
机构地区:[1]湖南商务职业技术学院会计学院,长沙410205 [2]华南师范大学经济与管理学院,广州510006 [3]深圳市国家税务局,广东深圳518000
出 处:《统计与决策》2020年第12期5-8,共4页Statistics & Decision
基 金:国家社会科学基金重点项目(18AJY003);湖南省自然科学基金面上项目(2019JJ40140);湖南省教育科学规划青年资助课题(XJK18QGD014)。
摘 要:文章运用中国健康与营养调查数据(CHNS)中2000-2015年人口数据作为考察对象,将可分解测度贫困指数(FGT)基于农村贫困线、城镇贫困线以及整体贫困线分解为组内与组间两个部分。结果表明,三种贫困指标的农村组内、城镇组内以及农村与城镇的组间贫困趋势基本一致,农村与城镇的组间贫困发生率、组间贫困距指数和组间贫困距平方指数呈现下降趋势,农村组内贫困发生率、贫困缺口率,以及贫困距平方指数由对增贫的弱化作用转为对增贫的正向贡献。This paper uses the demographic data from 2000 to 2015 from the China Health and Nutrition Survey(CHNS) as the object of study, and is based on the rural poverty line, urban poverty line and overall poverty line to decompose the resolvable measure poverty index(FGT) into within-group poverty and intergroup poverty. The research shows that the poverty index within rural groups, urban groups, and between rural and urban groups presents basically the same trends, that the incidence of intergroup poverty in rural and urban areas, intergroup poverty distance index, and the square index of poverty distance between groups shows a downward trend, and that the incidence of poverty, the poverty gap rate, and the poverty distance squared index in the rural group change from the weakening of poverty increase to the positive contribution to poverty increase.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.118.149.213