“以刑制罪”在网络经济犯罪认定中的适用  

Application of“Penalty Influencing Conviction”inthe Cognizance of Cyber Economic Crimes

作　　者：李兰英[1] LI Lan-ying(School of Law,Xiamen University,Xiamen 361005,Fujian)

机构地区：[1]厦门大学法学院,福建厦门361005

出　　处：《厦门大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2020年第4期108-119,共12页Journal of Xiamen University(A Bimonthly for Studies in Arts & Social Sciences)

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重大项目“网络金融犯罪的综合治理”(17ZDA148)。

摘　　要：对“以刑制罪”审判逻辑的利弊分析和价值权衡表明,传统的三段论式的刑事审判思维与现实主义背景下的以刑制罪的逆向思维是互相补充、对立统一的辩证关系。“以刑制罪”思维方式具有“必要的结果先行”“能动的司法观念”“实质的推理过程”“司法的综合效果”等显著特征,而罪刑法定的原则是其坚守的底线。虽然,“以刑制罪”在网络新型疑难经济犯罪认定中有其适用的内在需求和现实空间,但在适用“以刑制罪”的过程中,应以“社会价值”“法益内涵”和“刑事政策”作为权衡正当性的限制维度。检视“平台积分套现”以及“网络批量虚假注册”两种新型的网络经济行为可以发现,妥当适用“以刑制罪”更能实现社会整体的价值目标,获得更大程度的公众认同。According to the analysis of the pros and cons and the value trade-off of the trial logic of“penalty influencing conviction”,the traditional syllogism of criminal trial logic and the reverse thinking of“penalty influencing conviction”in the context of realism are complementary to each other and a unity of opposites.The thinking mode of“penalty influencing conviction”bears several notable features including“necessary results first”,“active judicial concept”,“substantive reasoning process”and“comprehensive judicial effect”,while holding the principle of legality is the bottom line.Although the logic of“penalty influencing conviction”has its own inherent needs and practical space in the cognizance of new and difficult economic crimes which arise on the Internet,it should take“social value”,“connotation of legal interests”and“criminal policy”as the restrictive dimensions to weigh the legitimacy in the process of applying this logic.From the two new types of cyber economic acts of“platform cashing-out of accumulated points”and“bulk false registration in cyberspace”,it is concluded that proper application of this logic can better achieve the value objectives of the whole society and obtain a greater degree of public recognition.

关 键 词：以刑制罪 网络经济犯罪 罪刑法定 法益内涵 刑事政策 

分 类 号：D924[政治法律—刑法学]