检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李飞[1] 杨穗[2] 汪三贵[3] LI Fei;YANG Sui;WANG San Gui(School of Economics, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, Hunan 410128, China;Rural Development Institute, Chinese Academy of Social Science, Beijing 100732, China;School of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China)
机构地区:[1]湖南农业大学经济学院,湖南长沙410128 [2]中国社会科学院农村发展研究所,北京100732 [3]中国人民大学农业与农村发展学院,北京100872
出 处:《财经理论与实践》2020年第4期94-100,共7页The Theory and Practice of Finance and Economics
基 金:湖南省哲学社会科学基金重大项目(16ZDA06)。
摘 要:依据5省10县“贫困村互助资金”三期追踪数据,基于收入流动视角,考量贫困村互助资金对农村居民收入流动性的影响。结果表明:尽管互助资金存在一定程度的精英俘获现象,但随着互助资金的发展,低收入群体逐渐有更多的惠及,短期参与互助资金有助于农户收入的向上流动;长期持续参与的农户向上流动的概率更高,且参与后持续使用的农户,收入流动性更强,增长流动的贡献更高。Promoting income mobility for low-income groups for the opportunity and possibility for them to"move upward"is an important reference framework to measure the effective convergence of poverty governance mechanisms in the"post-2020 era".The paper uses the three-phase panel data of"poverty village mutual fund projects"in 10 counties of 5 provinces to examine its impacts on the income mobility of rural residents from the perspective of income flow.The result indicates that although to a certain extent there is elite capture phenomenon,with the development of mutual funds,low-income groups gradually enjoy more benefits.Participating in mutual funds in a short-term helps farmers'income flow upward.And farmers who continue to participate in mutual funds for a long time have greater probability of upward mobility.Furthermore,famers who continue to use the mutual funds after participation have stronger income mobility and higher contribution to mobility growth.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.119.103.13