检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:程晨 CHENG Chen(Law School of Guizhou University,Guiyang Guizhou 550025,China)
出 处:《山西省政法管理干部学院学报》2020年第3期30-32,共3页Journal of Shanxi Politics and Law Institute for Administrators
摘 要:我国现有的法律体系,主要在继承法和侵权责任法中将胎儿视为独立主体进行保护,但并没有明确地承认其为"人"。这种模糊的保护现状正受到基因编辑婴儿诞生现实的冲击。确定胎儿是否具有"人"的资格是构建其权利保护体系基础。文章在分析了胎儿法律地位基础上,探讨了经过基因编辑的胎儿与自然胎儿权利间的矛盾,并对其进行了法理分析,以寻求更好的方法在合理范围内、最大限度地保护胎儿的利益。The existing legal system in China mainly regards the fetus as an independent subject for protection in inheritance law and tort liability law,but does not explicitly recognize it as a "person". This vague protection is being buffeted by the reality of gene-edited babies. Based on the analysis of the legal status of fetus,this paper discusses the contradiction between the rights of fetus and natural fetus after gene editing,and analyzes the legal theory of fetus in order to find a better way to protect the interests of the fetus in a reasonable scope to the maximum extent.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.186