“法理解释”的方法论证成及其裁判适用  

Jurisprudential Interpretation:Its Methodological Justification and Judicial Application

作　　者：闫朋 Yan Peng

机构地区：[1]江苏省高级人民法院

出　　处：《法治现代化研究》2020年第3期55-66,共12页Law and Modernization

摘　　要：在法律解释理论体系内部,狭义法律解释方法与广义法律解释方法存在明显的矛盾和张力。法律解释应当满足存在可供解释的条文规范、解释结果不超出文义可能范围这两个前提,并对法律解释方法的范围进行限定。法理解释是对裁判正当性理据的理解与说明,与法律解释共同构成完整的法解释和适用体系。司法裁判中要区分案件具体情形,选择严格的法律解释方法、运用法理解释的法律解释方法、纯粹的法理解释方法获得正当裁判结论,以弥合法律形式合理性与实质合理性的冲突。从发现法理到适用法理,法理解释是对法理运用于司法裁判的方法论探索。Within the theoretical system of legal interpretation,there are obvious contradictions and tensions between the method of narrow legal interpretation and the method of broad legal interpretation.The legal interpretation should meet the two preconditions requiring that there should be provisions for interpretation and the interpretation result should not exceed the possible scope of the meaning of the legal text;and the scope of the legal interpretation method should be appropriately defined as well.Jurisprudential interpretation is the understanding and explanation of the rationale behind the judicial decision,and together with the interpretation of specific laws constitutes a complete legal interpretation and application system.Judicial adjudication should distinguish the specific circumstances of the case;choose exact legal interpretation methods;and adopt the method of legal interpretation based on jurisprudential interpretation or the method of pure jurisprudential interpretation to obtain the right judgment conclusion.In so doing,the conflict between the rationality of legal form and the substantive rationality can be settled.From the identification of a jurisprudential principle to its application,the jurisprudential interpretation is a methodological exploration of the application of jurisprudence to judicial judgment.

关 键 词：法律解释 法理解释 司法裁判 形式合理性 实质合理性 

分 类 号：D90[政治法律—法学理论]