社会符号论的批判向度与力度——基于唯物史观的一种考察  

The Critical Dimension and Strength of Social Semiotic Approach:An Investigation Based on Historical Materialism

作　　者：方军[1] Fang Jun

机构地区：[1]中国社会科学院,北京100732

出　　处：《中国社会科学》2020年第7期4-25,204,共23页Social Sciences in China

摘　　要：通过马克思对商品、货币、资本等社会符号的深刻分析,可发现社会符号的颠倒与否定性质是社会符号普遍的有规律性的特质,是社会符号在一定社会形态下获得的历史规定性,其根源于人类实践的基本矛盾即对象化与非对象化的矛盾运动,由实践的辩证本质即以否定性为媒介的关系所规定,是否定性辩证法在符号上的具体表达。唯物史观视野中的社会符号论的批判是基于实践、基于现实、指向未来的,是具有革命性又具有建设性的批判。在当代,构建科学的社会符号论,不仅可以推动符号学的发展,而且是深化历史唯物主义的重要方面。Through his profound analysis of social symbols such as commodities,currencies and capital,Marx found that the reversal and negation of social symbols are general and regular characteristics of social symbols,and are historical characteristics that social symbols obtain under certain social formation.According to Marx,they are rooted in the basic contradiction of human practice,i.e.,the contradictory movement of objectification and non-objectification,defined by the dialectical nature of practice,that is,the relationship that takes negation as a medium,and is the concrete expression of negative dialectics in the sense of symbols.The Critical of social semiotic approach from the perspective of historical materialism is based on practice and reality and points at the future;it is both revolutionary and constructive.At present,the construction of social semiotic theory in a scientific way can not only promote the development of semiotics,but also be an important step in deepening historical materialism.

关 键 词：社会符号论 历史唯物主义 符号学 

分 类 号：A811[哲学宗教—马克思主义哲学] B03