检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:孟芳[1] MENG Fang(Department of Stomatology,the First Affiliated Hospital of Baotou Medical College,Inner Mongolia University of Science and Technology,Baotou,Inner Mongolia,014010 China)
机构地区:[1]内蒙古科技大学包头医学院第一附属医院口腔科,内蒙古包头014010
出 处:《中外医疗》2020年第15期60-62,共3页China & Foreign Medical Treatment
摘 要:目的探讨口腔正畸治疗中应用无托槽矫治技术的效果。方法方便选取2017年7月—2018年6月期间的66例口腔正畸患者作为研究对象。根据患者所使用的治疗方案的不同进行分组。采取传统固定矫治技术的33例患者为对照组,采取无托槽矫治技术的33例患者为观察组。观察并比较两组的正畸治疗情况、咀嚼功能情况及满意度。结果观察组的倾斜牙扶正时间(15.12±3.44)周、转位牙扶正时间(15.34±3.52)周、正畸治疗完成时间(37.52±2.46)周明显早于对照组的倾斜牙扶正时间(28.45±3.06)周、转位牙扶正时间(27.43±3.22)周、正畸治疗完成时间(59.64±5.23)周,差异有统计学意义(t=8.452、8.574、11.254,P=0.012、0.011、0.004);观察组的咬合力(155.34±12.54)磅、咀嚼效率(87.68±6.14)%明显高于对照组的咬合力(103.45±11.37)磅、咀嚼效率(70.28±6.42)%,差异有统计学意义(t=8.642、5.674,P=0.010、0.034);观察组对美观舒适性的满意度评分(8.24±1.35)分、对便捷性的满意度评分(9.04±0.72)分、对语言功能的满意度评分(9.21±0.75)分明显高于对照组对美观舒适性的满意度评分(6.43±2.24)分、对便捷性的满意度评分(6.51±2.36)分、对语言功能的满意度评分(7.25±2.02)分,差异有统计学意义(t=5.443、5.125、6.357,P=0.036、0.042、0.025)。结论无托槽矫治技术在口腔正畸治疗中有着理想的应用效果。Objective To explore the effect of bracketless correction technology in orthodontic treatment.Methods Sixty-six orthodontic patients from July 2017 to June 2018 were convenient selected as the research subjects.They were grouped according to the treatment regimen used by the patient.Thirty-three patients treated with traditional fixed orthodontics were used as the control group,and 33 patients treated with non-bracketed orthodontics were used as the observation group.To observe and compare the orthodontic treatment,chewing function and satisfaction of the two groups.Results The oblique teeth righting time(15.12±3.44)weeks,the orthodontic time(15.34±3.52)weeks,and the orthodontic treatment completion time(37.52±2.46)weeks were significantly earlier in the observation group than in the control group(28.45±3.06)weeks,orthodontic correction time(27.43±3.22)weeks,orthodontic treatment completion time(59.64±5.23)weeks,the difference was statistically significant(t=8.452,8.574,11.254,P=0.012,0.0110.004);the bite force(155.34±12.54)pounds and chewing efficiency(87.68±6.14)%of the observation group were significantly higher than the bite force(103.45±11.37)pounds and chewing efficiency(70.28±6.42)%of the control group.The differences were statistically significant(t=8.642,5.674,P=0.010,0.034);the observation group's satisfaction rating for aesthetic comfort(8.24±1.35)points,satisfaction rating for convenience(9.04±0.72)points,language function(9.21±0.75)points were significantly higher than the control group’s satisfaction score(6.43±2.24)for aesthetic comfort,convenience score(6.51±2.36),and language function satisfaction(7.25±2.02)points,the difference was statistically significant(t=5.443,5.125,6.357,P=0.036,0.042,0.025).Conclusion Bracket-free orthodontics has ideal application effect in orthodontic treatment.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222