检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:郁林羲 Yu Linxi
机构地区:[1]中国药科大学《中国天然药物》编辑部,江苏南京210009
出 处:《大学图书馆学报》2020年第4期12-19,共8页Journal of Academic Libraries
摘 要:2018-2019年,美国加州大学与全球最大的学术出版商爱思唯尔(Elsevier)围绕开放获取协议进行了约两年的博弈。2019年2月,加州大学宣布谈判破裂,同年4月,加州大学与剑桥大学出版社签订了美国第一个开放获取协议,加州大学成为全球开放获取运动的焦点。该案例反映了科学共同体希望实现科研成果公有化的迫切意愿,是科学共同体积极主动推动开放获取的典型案例。文章详细梳理了该案例的发展历程,并运用多元行动者交互作用分析法分析了加州大学、爱思唯尔和剑桥大学出版社等不同行动者在该案例中由于价值取向和利益需求不同导致的复杂利益博弈关系,以期为我国大学和科研机构参与全球开放获取运动提供参考和理论依据。From 2018 to 2019,the University of California and the world s largest academic publisher Elsevier have had a two-year negotiation on the open access agreement.In February 2019,the University of California announced that the negotiation finally failed.In April,the University of California signed the first open access agreement in the United States with Cambridge University Press and became the focus of the global open access movement.This case typically reflects not only the urgent desire of the publicization of scientific research achievements but also the active promotion of open access of the scientific community.The article combs in detail and analyzes the complicated benefits of different stakeholders due to different value orientations and interest needs involved in this case such as the UC,Elsevier and Cambridge University Press through a multi-stakeholder interaction analysis method.It is hoped to provide reference and theoretical basis for Chinese universities and research institutions for participating in the global open access movement.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.221.40.13