国际化背景下我国图书情报学与世界各国研究相似性的测度与比较——基于1999—2018年Web of Science论文的耦合分析  

Measurement and Comparison of Library and Information Science Research Similarities between China and Other Countries against the Background of Internationalization—Based on the Coupling Analysis ofWeb of Science Articles from 1999 to 2018

作　　者：温芳芳[1] Wen Fangfang(School of Management,Henan University of Science and Technology,Luoyang 471023)

机构地区：[1]河南科技大学管理学院,洛阳471023

出　　处：《情报学报》2020年第7期687-697,共11页Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重点项目“中国人文社科学术成果的国际影响力综合评价研究”(17ATQ009)。

摘　　要：我国图书情报学的国际发文量稳步增长,国际交流与合作不断加强,国际化是否会导致国家之间研究趋同?以Web of Science收录的1999—2018年发表的研究论文为样本,本文分别采用文献耦合(country bibliographic coupling,CBC)和关键词耦合(country keyword coupling,CKC)方法对我国图书情报学与其他国家之间的研究相似度进行测量,并对指标值进行时间和空间两个维度的分析与比较。结果表明,就整体而言CBC与CKC指标平均值分别呈现出逐年增长和略微下降的趋势,但是就个体而言我国与世界主要发文国家在CBC和CKC两个方面都呈现出明显的研究趋同性。本文由研究相似度引发关于国际学术话语权的思考,探讨了我国图书情报学国际化进程中面临的机遇与挑战。Against the background of internationalization,Chinese scholars are publishing a growing number of international papers and increasingly enhancing their communication and collaboration with researchers abroad in the domain of Library and Information Science(LIS).Will this lead to the homogeneity of research?With the articles indexed in Web of Science(WoS)from 1999 to 2018,this study employs the Country Bibliographic Coupling(CBC)and Country Keyword Coupling(CKC)methods to measure the research similarities between China and other countries/regions,and compare their indicators from multiple dimensions.Results indicate that the annual values of CBC and CKC strength display the overall obvious upward and slight downward trends,respectively.However,both the CBC and CKC indicators between China and the most productive countries have displayed significant homogeneity over the past two decades.These findings arouse some reflections and concerns about academic discourse during the process of internationalization.Subsequently,opportunities and challenges encountered by Chinese LIS scholars are discussed.

关 键 词：研究相似度 国际趋同化 文献耦合 关键词耦合 国际化 

分 类 号：G353.1[文化科学—情报学]