检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈凤鸣 CHEN Fengming(School of Law, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China)
出 处:《河南工业大学学报(社会科学版)》2020年第3期50-55,113,共7页Journal of Henan University of Technology:Social Science Edition
摘 要:追偿权在我国民商法领域内的运用日益增多。追偿权的适用一般牵涉三方法律关系。追偿权的法律性质应是一种非典型之债。因侵权补充责任的承担人具有一定的可归责性,其追偿权与一般的追偿权不尽相同,并且补充责任的本质是中间责任而非最终责任,故法律规定承担补充责任的情形,均应当与追偿权配合行使才能发挥制度优势,实现立法目的。同时《民法典侵权责任编(草案)》(三审稿)对补充责任及其追偿权的变动,也是在一定程度上肯定了赋予补充责任人追偿权的必要性。The use of the recovery right becomes increasingly common in civil and commercial law.The recovery right usually involves the tripartite legal relationship and its legal nature should be atypical debt.As the person of supplement liability should be obligor for the accountability,whose recovery right is different from other liability.And the supplement liability is not ultimate responsibility and subjected to the chronological order.The law should specify the circumstances of supplement liability and comply with the recovery right to achieve the legislative purpose.And according to The Draft of the Tort Liability Law of Civil Code,the modifications of supplement liability and its recovery right somehow affirm the necessity of giving the person of supplement liability the recovery right.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.38