回归学术史:古典目录学在当代语境下的存在合法性  

Regression to the Academic History:the Existence of Classical Bibliography Has Its Legality in Contemporary Context

作　　者：傅荣贤[1] Fu Rongxian(College of Literature,Yangzhou University)

机构地区：[1]扬州大学文学院,江苏扬州225002

出　　处：《图书馆》2020年第7期10-13,25,共5页Library

基　　金：2018年度江苏省双创人才项目“古典目录的学术史书写与学术秩序建构研究”阶段性成果。

摘　　要：在反思古代学案体与近现代章节体学术史研究成果之不足的基础上,揭示古代目录的学术史书写价值,分析古代目录学术史书写的方法论、本体论和目的论,指出通过古典目录建构原创性的古代学术史及其学术秩序,不仅是可能的也是必要的。而回归学术史,也是古典目录学在当代语境下的存在合法性的主要依据。On the basis of reflecting on the insufficiency of the academic history research results of the ancient academic case style and the modern chapter style,this article reveals the writing value of the academic history of ancient bibliography,analyzes its methodology,ontology and teleology.It is pointed out that it is not only possible but also necessary to construct an original ancient academic history and its academic order through classical catalogs.The return to academic history is also the main basis for the legitimacy of classical bibliography in the contemporary context.

关 键 词：古典目录学 学术史 目录学 

分 类 号：G257[文化科学—图书馆学]