检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:孙昊亮[1] 马荣[1] SUN Haoliang;MA Rong
机构地区:[1]西北政法大学,陕西西安710000
出 处:《湖南师范大学社会科学学报》2020年第4期21-28,共8页Journal of Social Science of Hunan Normal University
基 金:国家社会科学基金项目“全媒体时代著作权制度的应对和变革研究”(15BFX141);西北政法大学“文化产业法”青年学术创新团队项目;“陕西高校人文社会科学青年英才支持计划”项目。
摘 要:我国学者对知识产权法律制度中的隐喻修辞研究取得了一些成果,但也存在不足之处,如忽略了该认知方法会产生混同法律事实、错误嫁接法律规划效应。"新闻搬运工"作为知识产权语篇中的新鲜隐喻,仅关注位置变化的相似性,却混同了有体物和无形财产的不同属性、物理转移和网络复制的语境转变、单纯事实消息和新闻作品的传播差异。为使隐喻修辞能够更好地适用于法学领域,应当以本体、喻体二者的异性特征为出发点,挖掘隐喻表象之下的核心法律问题,并区分本体、喻体不同语境中的具体法律事实;当新型技术发展可能引发法律制度变革时,应在准确把握立法本意的基础上正确适用法律。At present,some progress has been made in the research on the metaphor rhetoric in intellectual property legal system,but there are some shortcomings,which ignores the cognitive method will produce negative effects such as confusion of legal facts and wrong grafting legal rules. As a fresh metaphor in intellectual property discourse,"news porters"only focuses on the similarity of position changes,but mixes different attributes of physical objects and intangible property,changes in the context of physical transfer and network replication,the transmission difference of simple factual news and news works. In order to make metaphor rhetoric better applicable to the field of law,first of all,it is necessary to explore the core legal problems under metaphorical rhetoric,which is based on the opposite characteristics. Then,we should distinguish the specific legal facts in different contexts. At last,when the new technology development may lead to the change of legal system,the legal provisions should be applied correctly on the basis of accurately grasping the original meaning of legislation.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.144.114.63