检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张永进 Zhang Yong-Jin(School of Law,Hebei University of Economics and Business,Shijiazhuang 050061,China)
出 处:《政法学刊》2020年第3期88-95,共8页Journal of Political Science and Law
基 金:2019年河北省社科基金项目“河北检察办案中的人工智能应用研究”(HB19FX012)。
摘 要:司法责任制是司法改革的基础和关键,也是优化检察权运行机制的重要内容。作为英美法系代表的美国,其检察官办案责任制深嵌于联邦制结构和三权分立政体之中,并形成了个人负责制为代表的典型模式,具体表现在办案组织的个体性、运行机制的自主性、办案监督的自治性、责任追究的有限性、办案保障的全面性等内容。作为旨在实现以"谁办案谁负责、谁决定谁负责"为目标的司法责任制改革,未来我国检察官办案责任制改革应当借鉴美国经验,并在遵循历史传统中实现新的变革。Judicial liability system is not only the basis and key of judicial reform, but also an important part of optimizing the operation mechanism of procuratorial power. As the representative of the Anglo-American legal system, the prosecutor’s case-handling liability system of the United States is deeply embedded in the federal structure and the separation of powers, and has formed a typical model represented by the individual liability system and reflected in the aspects of individuality of the case-handling organization, autonomy of the operating mechanism, autonomy of casehandling supervision, limitation of accountability and comprehensiveness of case-handling protection. As a judicial liability system reform aiming at "He who handles the case is responsible and he who decides is responsible", the future reform of the prosecutor’s case-handling liability system in China should learn from the experience of the United States and realize new changes in following the historical tradition.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.221.240.145