气相聚丙烯Spherizone工艺和Horizone工艺的技术对比  

Technical comparison between Spherizone and Horizone gas phase polypropylene technology

作　　者：吕海龙 刘林朔 LU Hai-long;LIU Lin-shuo(Hainan Petrochemical Co Ltd,SINOPEC,Yangpu 578001,China;Polypropylene Workshop of Zhanjiang Dongxing Petrochemical Co Ltd,SINOPEC,Zhanjiang 524012,China)

机构地区：[1]中国石化海南炼油化工有限公司,海南洋浦578001 [2]中国石化湛江东兴石油化工有限公司聚丙烯车间,广东湛江524012

出　　处：《石化技术与应用》2020年第4期280-283,共4页Petrochemical Technology & Application

摘　　要：从工艺特点,催化剂种类及活性,原料、催化剂及公用工程消耗等方面,对气相法聚丙烯Spherizone工艺和Horizone工艺进行了技术对比。结果表明:2种工艺都能提供多种转让牌号,Horizone工艺在车用聚丙烯方面的应用更有优势,其高乙烯、高橡胶含量的NEWCON产品具有良好的刚韧平衡性;Spherizone工艺的单体、催化剂和公用工程典型单耗均低于Horizone工艺。Spherizone and Horizone gas phase polypropylene processing technologies were compared between their technical characteristics,types and activities of catalysts,consumptions of raw materials,catalysts and utilities,etc.The results showed that both technologies could provide many transfer brands of polypropylene,Horizone technology had more advantages in automobile polypropylene,its NEWCON products with high ethylene and high rubber contents showed better balance between rigidity and toughness.The monomer,catalyst and typical unit utilities consumption of Spherizone technology were lower than Horizone technology.

关 键 词：聚丙烯 气相法 SPHERIZONE工艺 Horizone工艺 催化剂 

分 类 号：TQ325.14[化学工程—合成树脂塑料工业]