《四库全书》文渊阁本与文津阁本医家类异同析论——以伤寒类医书为例  

Analysis of Similarities and Differences Between Medical Books in Wenyuange Edition and Wenjinge Edition of Siku Quanshu: Taking Medical Books on Febrile Diseases as an Example

作　　者：逯铭昕[1] LU Ming-xin(Library of Shandong Normal University,Jinan 250014,China)

机构地区：[1]山东师范大学图书馆,山东济南250014

出　　处：《图书馆研究》2020年第3期108-114,共7页Library Research

基　　金：国家社会科学基金青年项目“宋金元伤寒著述版本研究与辑佚”(项目编号:16CTQ011)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：《四库全书》文渊阁本与文津阁本的医家类无论在成书时间、底本选择还是文字内容上皆有不少差异。这些差异不仅仅是抄写者的"手民之误",其背后也反映了两个版本的不同校勘特色。文渊阁本相对于所据旧本的改动较大,且多以理校改字,而文津阁本则更加忠实于原书,对其中舛误多未加改正。究其原因,二者的不同特色一方面源于抄校时四库馆奖惩制度的制定与执行,另一方面也与覆勘时详校官的不同身份有着密切联系。There are many differences in the completion time, the choice of the versionand and the content of the text between Wenyuange edition and Wenjinge edition of Siku Quanshu. These differences could not just be attributed to the scribe’s mistakes, it also reflects the different collation features of the two versions. Wenyuange edition has a larger change than the original version, while Wenjinge edition is more faithful to the original version. The different characteristics of two editions not only related to the overall collation quality of the book at stage of transcription, but also closely related to the different identities of censors at re-examination stage.

关 键 词：《四库全书》 文渊阁本 文津阁本 医家类 

分 类 号：G256[文化科学—图书馆学]