检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:孙海波 Sun Haibo
机构地区:[1]中国政法大学比较法学研究院
出 处:《政法论坛》2020年第4期155-163,共9页Tribune of Political Science and Law
基 金:中国政法大学青年教师学术创新团队支持计划;中国政法大学钱端升杰出学者支持计划资助。
摘 要:能否通过法律强制执行道德,在自由主义与法律道德主义者之间曾产生过激烈的争辩。以德弗林为代表的传统法律道德主义以至善主义核心传统为理论基础,倡导国家对公民不道德行为的立法干预。自由主义者站在国家中立性的立场上,强调个人自治性的重要意义,以此对法律道德主义提出了诸多批评。乔治基于共同善构建了一种多元至善主义理论,这一理论兼顾了个人自治和价值多元,轻巧地避开了传统法律道德主义经常遭受的那些批评。它一方面能最大限度地保护公民的基本权利和自由,另一方面又能为政府的立法干预提供严格的限制。There has been a heated debate between liberalists and legal moralists about whether morality can be enforced by law.The traditional legal moralism represented by Devlin is based on the core tradition of perfectionism,which advocates the state’s legislative intervention in citizens’immoral behaviors.On the state neutral standpoint,liberals emphasize the importance of individual autonomy,so they put forward many criticisms to the legal moralism.Based on the notion of common good,George constructed a theory of pluralistic perfectionism,which took both individual autonomy and value pluralism into account.It skillfully avoided the criticism that traditional legal moralism often suffered.On the one hand,it can maximize the protection of the citizens’basic rights and freedom,on the other hand,can provide the government’s legislative intervention with strict restrictions.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7