检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:盖斌 Gai Bin(People’s Police Unuversity of China,Langfang,Hebei,065000 China)
出 处:《西部公安论坛》2020年第2期9-13,共5页Journal of Western Public Security
摘 要:警察开枪行为是一种裁量性的行为,开枪的对象是公民,枪支射出的子弹具有强大的杀伤力,势必会对公民的权利造成影响。因此,开枪裁量权的扩张必然也会使公民权受侵犯的程度加大。但是,开枪的裁量权与公民权存在冲突的同时,也存在统一,即警察开枪具有保护公民权利的目的。所以这种矛盾存在可以调和的可能,降低开枪裁量权造成的损害,提高对公民权利的保护程度,实现权力与权利之间的平衡。Police shooting is a kind of discretionary behavior.The target of the shooting is citizen.The bullets fired by the guns have strong lethality and will inevitably affect the rights of citizens.Therefore,the expansion of the discretionary power of shooting will inevitably increase the degree of violation of citizenship.However,there is a conflict between the discretionary right to shoot and the civil rights,and there is also unity,that is,the police have the purpose of protecting the rights of citizens.Therefore,this contradiction has the potential to be reconciled,reduce the damage caused by the right to shoot,increase the degree of protection of citizens"rights,and achieve a balance between power and rights.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.23.128.245