检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杨帅卫 Yang Shuai-wei(East China Political Science and law University,Shanghai,200042 China)
机构地区:[1]华东政法大学,上海200042
出 处:《西部公安论坛》2020年第2期20-23,80,共5页Journal of Western Public Security
摘 要:虚假诉讼是当事人恶意为之,其对案外人的正当利益及司法秩序的危害不言而喻,因此需要对虚假诉讼行为予以识别和规制。虚假诉讼的形成有诸多因素,对当事人主义诉讼模式的追求给虚假诉讼的发生提供了契机,对非法利益的追求是促使当事人进行虚假诉讼的主要原因。对虚假诉讼的识别应当结合理论与实践,综合案件证据与诉讼行为对其予以认定。而对于虚假诉讼的规制在强化事后惩治的同时,也应当注重事前防范。False litigation is done maliciously by the parties,and it is self-evident to the legitimate interests of outsiders and the harm to the judicial order.Therefore,it is necessary to identify and regulate false litigation.There are many factors in the formation of false litigation.The pursuit of the litigant model of litigation provides an opportunity for the occurrence of false litigation.The pursuit of ilegal interests is the main reason for the parties to carry out false litigation.The identification of false litigation should be combined with theory and practice,and be confirmed by comprehensive case evidence and litigation.While the regulation of false litigation should strengthen the punishment afterwards,it should also pay attention to precautions.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15