检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈伟娟[1] 赵海燕 孔冬[3] 崔新[3] 杨丽娟[3] CHEN Wei-juan;ZHAO Hai-yan;KONG Dong;CUI Xin;YANG Li-juan(Dept.of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine,East Branch,Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University,Jinan 250014,China;Dept.of Intensive Care Unit,East Branch,Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University,Jinan 250014,China;Dept.of Nursing Administration,Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University,Jinan 250014,China)
机构地区:[1]山东大学附属省立医院东院呼吸与危重症医学科,山东济南250014 [2]山东大学附属省立医院东院重症医学科,山东济南250014 [3]山东大学附属省立医院护理部,山东济南250014
出 处:《护理学报》2020年第14期20-25,共6页Journal of Nursing(China)
摘 要:目的评价总结成年肿瘤患者癌因性疲乏筛查与评估的最佳证据,为临床护理人员实施癌因性疲乏的管理提供参考。方法采用PICO的方法确定科学问题,明确检索策略和纳排标准,计算机检索建库至2019年3月Up To Date、苏格兰院际指南网、英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所、加拿大安大略注册护士协会、美国国立指南网、中国医脉通指南网、美国国家综合癌症网络、美国临床肿瘤协会、加拿大心理社会肿瘤协会、肿瘤护理协会、安大略省癌症护理中心、Cochrane Library、JBI图书馆、PubMed、中国知网、万方、维普及中国生物医学文献数据库关于成年肿瘤患者癌因性疲乏筛查和评估的证据,包括临床决策、临床指南、证据总结。由2名研究者对文献进行质量评价、证据提取与综合。结果共纳入文献6篇,包括临床决策1篇、指南4篇、证据总结1篇,最终总结出筛查时机、筛查工具、筛查者、评估时机、评估内容、评估者、筛查评估方法及培训8个方面12条最佳证据。结论成年肿瘤患者癌因性疲乏筛查与评估的最佳证据可为临床应用提供循证依据,护理人员可根据证据进行临床护理实践。Objective To evaluate and summarize the best evidence of screening and assessment of cancer-related fatigue in adult cancer patients. Methods We searched the Up to Date, Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, Registered Nurses Association of Ontario, National Guideline Clearinghouse, Chinese Medicine Guideline,National Comprehensive Cancer Network, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Canadian Society for Psychosocial Oncology, Oncology Nursing Society, Ontario Cancer Care Center, Cochrane Library, JBI library, PubMed, CNKI, Wanfang,VIP and CBM from the inception to March 2019, to collect literatures including guideline, evidence summary, recommended practice, system review about the best evidence of screening and assessment of cancer-related fatigue in adult cancer patients. Two researchers assessed the quality of literatures and extracted evidence from qualified literatures. Results Six articles were selected, including one clinical decision, four guidelines and one evidence summary. Eight categories(screening time, screening tools, screening practitioners, assessment time,assessment practitioners, assessment contents, screening and assessment methods and training)and totally 12 items of best evidence were summarized. Conclusion The best evidence for screening and evaluation of cancer-related fatigue in adult cancer patients can provide evidence-based basis for clinical application, and nursing staff can conduct clinical nursing practice based on the evidence.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.183