秘密调查:龙泉司法档案所见民事诉讼程序研究  

Secret Investigation: Study on Civil Investigation Procedures in Longquan Judicial Archives

作　　者：吴铮强[1] Wu Zhengqiang(School of Humanities,Zhejiang University,Hanghzou 310028)

机构地区：[1]浙江大学人文学院历史系,杭州310028

出　　处：《浙江社会科学》2020年第8期148-154,160,共8页Zhejiang Social Sciences

基　　金：国家社科基金重大项目“龙泉司法档案整理与研究(13&ZD151)”阶段性成果。

摘　　要：1912至1918年间,龙泉县民事诉讼中出现了秘密调查程序,不同的主审官对秘密调查程序的运用存在一个演变的过程。朱光奎是民事诉讼秘密调查程序的首创者,有可能脱离庭审程序,依据秘密调查直接形成事实认定。杨毓琦似乎是朱光奎的模仿者,脱离庭审、依据秘密调查直接"发现真实"的模式在他手中完全失败。张绍轩、张济演让事实认定不再脱离庭审,以庭审排除秘密调查结果的反证,秘密调查仍是事实认定的基础。王施海仍然采用秘密调查程序,但秘密调查不再构成事实认定的直接依据,而是成为庭审的准备工作,事实认定主要通过庭审完成。揭示龙泉县1910年代秘密调查的发现真实模式,可以从官僚制的角度丰富对中国现代化进程的理解。Between 1912 and 1918, a secret investigation procedure took place in the civil lawsuit of Longquan County, and the evolution of the application of secret investigation procedures by different presiding judges also took its course. Zhu Guangkui is the pioneer of the secret investigation procedure for civil litigation, who made it possible to detach the investigation from a trial procedure and to directly resort to factfinding. Yang Yuqi seemed to be Zhu Guangkui’s imitator, who failed to accomplish the "fact-finding mode" done on the basis of the trial-exempted secret investigation. On the contrary, Zhang Shaoxuan and Zhang Ji did not detach the fact-finding from the trial, and instead used the trial to rule out the disproving of the secret investigation’s outcome, in which course secret investigation was still the basis of fact-finding process. Wang Shihai still used the secret investigation procedure, but the secret investigation no longer constituted the direct basis of the fact-finding process, but became the trial preparation work;in other words,the fact-finding was mainly completed through the trial. Revealing the true pattern of the secret investigation in Longquan County in 1910 can enrich the understanding of China’s modernization process from the perspective of bureaucracy.

关 键 词：秘密调查 发现真实模式 职权主义 龙泉司法档案 

分 类 号：D929[政治法律—法学]