检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张良清 邹伟伟 金俊 李军领 谭旭初 代文化 ZHANGH Liang-qing(Department of Anesthesiology,Zhongshan Torch Development Zone Hospital,Zhongshan Guangdong,52843,China)
机构地区:[1]中山火炬开发区医院麻醉科,广东中山528437
出 处:《齐齐哈尔医学院学报》2020年第10期1208-1210,共3页Journal of Qiqihar Medical University
摘 要:目的分析臂丛+颈丛神经阻滞麻醉在肩部和上臂手术中的应用效果。方法选取2016年6月—2019年9月本院收治的70例肩部和上臂手术患者作为研究对象,随机平均分为对照组和观察组两组,每组各35例。对照组采纳臂丛神经阻滞麻醉,观察组采纳臂丛联合颈丛神经阻滞麻醉。对比两组不同时间段血流动力学指标、麻醉优良率、麻醉起效时间、麻醉维持时间、不良反应发生情况。结果观察组切皮后、缝合时心率、平均动脉压均明显比对照组低,观察组麻醉优良率(94.29%)明显高于对照组(74.29%),观察组麻醉起效时间、麻醉维持时间均明显比对照组短,差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组不良反应发生率(8.57%)与对照组(5.71%)比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论肩部和上臂手术患者实施臂丛+颈丛神经阻滞麻醉,可有效维持血流动力学稳定性,缩短麻醉起效时间,且不良反应发生率较低,值得借鉴。Objective To analyze the application effect of brachial plexus and cervical plexus block anesthesia in shoulder and upper arm operation.Methods From June 2016 to September 2019, 70 patients underwent shoulder and upper arm operations were enrolled in our hospital. They were randomly divided into two groups on average. 35 patients in the control group received brachial plexus block anesthesia, and 35 patients in the observation group received brachial plexus combined with cervical plexus block anesthesia. The hemodynamic indexes, excellent rate of anesthesia, onset time and maintenance time of anesthesia and occurrence of adverse reactionswere compared between the two groups.Results The heart rate and average arterial pressure of the observation group were significantly lower than those of the control group after sectioning and suturing. The excellent rate of anesthesia in the observation group(94.29%) was significantly higher than that in the control group(74.29%). The onset time and maintenance time of anesthesia in the observation group were significantly shorter than those in the control group, with statistical significance(P<0.05). The incidence of adverse reactions in the observation group(8.57%) was higher than that in the control group(5.71%), however, the difference was not statistically significant(P>0.05).Conclusions Brachial plexus and cervical plexus block anesthesia could effectively maintain hemodynamic stability, shorten the onset time of anesthesia, and the incidence of adverse reactions is low, which is worth learning.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7