论专家在精神病司法鉴定拒绝启动中的参与效能  

On the Participation Efficiency of Experts in the Initiation of Rejection of Psychiatric Judicial Expertise

作　　者：陶然 Tao Ran

机构地区：[1]辽宁大学法学院,辽宁沈阳110036

出　　处：《行政与法》2020年第7期78-86,共9页Administration and Law

基　　金：辽宁省教育厅科学研究经费人文社科项目“刑事司法与精神医学的融合:精神病司法鉴定程序规制问题研究”的阶段性成果,项目编号:LR2019009;四川省哲学社会科学重点研究基地——四川医事卫生法治研究中心课题“司法鉴定与专家辅助人的共存问题研究”的阶段性成果,项目编号:YF17-Y18;中央财政2018年省级重点学科建设项目(重大慢病防治基础研究与转化平台项目)“刑事案件精神病鉴定的程序保障问题研究”的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：在社会普遍关注的热点刑事案件中,司法机关拒绝启动精神病司法鉴定常常引发质疑。结合精神医学的科学理论与思维逻辑,对司法机关拒绝启动精神病司法鉴定的理由进行剖析发现,拒绝启动鉴定理由论述的科学性、专业性欠缺是让民众难以信服的重要因素。在专业问题由专业人士解决的理念指导下,在精神病司法鉴定拒绝启动中适时引入专家参与审查程序,结合办案机关拒绝理由心证公开机制,有助于实现维护司法公正和增加社会公信力的效能。In the hot criminal cases which are widely concerned by the society,the refusal of judicial organs to start the forensic expertise of mental illness is often questioned.Combining with the scientific theory and thinking logic of psychiatry,this paper analyzes the reasons why the judicial organ refuses to start the forensic examination of mental illness.It is found that the lack of scientific and professional reasons in the decision of refusing to start the forensic appraisal is an important factor that makes the public unconvinced.Under the guidance of the idea that professional problems should be solved by professionals,the timely introduction of expert participation in the review process in the decision of refusing to start the forensic expertise of mental illness,combined with the mechanism of public evaluation of the reasons for the refusal of the case handling organs,is conducive to maintaining judicial justice and increasing social credibility.

关 键 词：精神病鉴定 专家参与 启动权 

分 类 号：D919.3[医药卫生—法医学]