“我们才是真的弱者”——游民文化意识与创造社批评话语的建构  

“We are Really Weak”:Nomadic Cultural Consciousness and the Construction of Criticism Discourse

作　　者：彭冠龙[1] 周循 PENG Guan-long;ZHOU Xun(School of Chinese Language and Literature,Shandong Normal University,Jinan 250014,China)

机构地区：[1]山东师范大学文学院,山东济南250014

出　　处：《贵州师范大学学报（社会科学版）》2020年第4期110-118,共9页Journal of Guizhou Normal University(Social Sciences)

基　　金：山东省高等学校人文社科计划一般项目A类项目(J17RA040)的研究成果。

摘　　要：创造社成员的文学批评话语中往往夹杂着大量非文学因素,这一现象根源于一种游民文化意识。他们不是游民,而是现代知识分子,但自幼接触社会游民,并对这一群体的某些特质表示敬佩和欣赏,成年后长期的游民生活状态,尤其是在文学方面长期自我感觉游离于主流文坛秩序之外,使他们形成了带有游民气的被压迫感和反抗精神,这些都影响了他们的文学批评话语,从而出现了创造社成立前后一系列貌似标新立异和狂飙突进的论争文章,以及文学作品中的零余者形象,并进一步成为他们接受马克思主义文论、提倡无产阶级革命文学的心理基础。The literary criticism discourse of members of the Chuangzaoshe is often mixed with a large number of non-literary factors. This phenomenon is rooted in a Vagrant Culture. The members of the Chuangzaoshe are not vagrants, but modern intellectuals, or have contacted social vagrants since childhood and admired and appreciated certain characteristics of this group. The long-term life conditions of vagrants after adulthood, especially in literature, have long felt that they have been separated from the mainstream. Outside of the literary world order, they formed a sense of oppression and a spirit of resistance, which influenced their discourse on literary criticism. As a result, a series of unconventional and violently arguing articles before and after the creation of the Chuangzaoshe, as well as the image of the extra people,in the works has further become the psychological basis for them to accept Marxist literary theory and advocate proletarian revolutionary literature.

关 键 词：创造社 游民文化 五四文学 

分 类 号：I106[文学—世界文学]