急诊重症监护室运用护理标识对提高护理质量的影响分析  

Analysis of the Impact of Emergency Intensive Care Unit on the Use of Nursing Marks to Improve the Quality of Care

作　　者：韩聪 刘宇飞[1] HAN Cong;LIU Yu-fei(The Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University Emergency Intensive Care Unit,Dalian,Liaoning Province,116021 China)

机构地区：[1]大连医科大学附属第二医院急诊重症监护室,辽宁大连116021

出　　处：《中外医疗》2020年第16期160-162,共3页China & Foreign Medical Treatment

摘　　要：目的评定在急诊重症监护室中使用护理标识对提升护理服务质量的价值。方法方便选取2017年4月—2019年10月该医院急诊重症监护室诊治的62例危急重症患者实施数据指标研究,分组方式选取随机数字表方法,每组31例,实验组实行一般护理干预服务结合护理标识,参比组实行一般护理干预服务,分析护理危险事件总统计率、护理纠纷事件总统计率、护理满意总统计率、各项指标护理质量评估结果。结果实验组护理危险事件总统计率(3.23%)比较于参比组评估数据(19.35%)下降,差异有统计学意义(χ^2=4.026,P=0.044<0.05);实验组护理纠纷事件总统计率(0.00%)比较于参比组评估数据(12.90%)下降,差异有统计学意义(χ^2=4.275,P=0.038<0.05);实验组护理满意总统计率(96.77%)比较于参比组评估数据(77.42%)提升,差异有统计学意义(χ^2=5.166,P=0.023<0.05);实验组基础护理评定分值、危重护理评定分值、护理文书书写评定分值、操作技能评定分值、消毒及隔离评定分值[(94.20±2.36)分、(95.34±2.20)分、(93.10±2.16)分、(95.27±2.40)分、(97.30±2.13)分]比较于参比组评估数据[(88.62±1.10)分、(90.50±1.45)分、(86.69±1.30)分、(84.60±1.12)分、(95.49±1.20)分]提升,差异有统计学意义(t=11.931、10.227、14.156、22.431、4.122,P=0.000、0.000、0.000、0.000、0.000<0.05)。结论在急诊重症监护室中选用护理标识有助于促使护理服务质量明显提高。Objective To evaluate the value of using nursing logos in improving the quality of nursing services in the emergency intensive care unit.Methods To conveniently select 62 critically ill patients diagnosed and treated in the hospital's emergency intensive care unit from April 2017 to October 2019.The random number table method was used for grouping.31 cases per group.The experimental group was implemented the general nursing intervention service combined with the nursing label,the reference group implemented the general nursing intervention service,and analyzed the total statistical rate of nursing risk events,the total statistical rate of nursing dispute events,the total statistical rate of nursing satisfaction,and the results of various indicators of nursing quality evaluation.Results The total statistical rate of nursing risk events in the experimental group(3.23%)decreased compared with the evaluation data of the reference group(19.35%),the difference was statistically significant(χ^2=4.026,P=0.044<0.05);the total statistical rate of nursing dispute events in the experimental group(0.00%),compared with the reference group evaluation data(12.90%)decreased,the difference was statistically significant(χ^2=4.275,P=0.038<0.05);the total statistical satisfaction rate of the experimental group(96.77%)compared with the reference group evaluation data(77.42%)improved,the difference was statistically significant(χ^2=5.166,=0.023<0.05);the basic nursing evaluation score,critical care evaluation score,nursing writing evaluation score,operating skill evaluation score,disinfection and isolation evaluation score of the experimental group[(94.20±2.36) points,(95.34±2.20)points,(93.10±2.16)points,(95.27±2.40)points,(97.30±2.13)points];compared with the reference group evaluation data[(88.62±1.10)points,(90.50±1.45)points,(86.69±1.30)points,(84.60±1.12)points,(95.49±1.20)points]improved(t=11.931,10.227,14.156,22.431,4.122,P=0.000,0.000,0.000,0.000,0.000<0.05).Conclusion The selection of nursing labels in emergency

关 键 词：急诊 重症监护室 护理标识 护理质量 

分 类 号：R5[医药卫生—内科学]