检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张秀玲[1] ZHANG Xiu-ling
出 处:《北方论丛》2020年第5期66-72,共7页The Northern Forum
摘 要:近年来,各地出现了针对小商户发起的"地毯式"维权诉讼,代理人为能速战速决,获得更多赔偿,经常会运用各种技巧,例如:通常不列强者为共同被告;或者拆分诉讼、迟延起诉等有违诚信的做法。在司法实践中,既要确保正当维权顺利进行,也要保护小商户的正当权益不受侵害。对此,提出如下建议:对有违诚信的诉讼技巧应予禁止;修改完善相关法规,引导权利人从上游维权、净化源头,从根本上铲除侵权产品;加强对小商户的知识产权普法宣传;改革法官考核制度。In recent years, many intellectual property owners initiat lots of rights protection lawsuits against small merchants. Their agents always use various techniques in order to obtain more compensation and make quick decisions: such as usually not listing the stronger as co-defendants;Or split lawsuits, delay prosecutions and other practices that violate honesty. In judicial practice, we must not only ensure the smooth progress of legitimate rights protection, but also protect the legitimate rights and interests of small merchants from infringement. In this regard, the following suggestions are put forward: Prohibit litigation techniques that violate integrity;Modify and improve relevant laws and regulations to guide right holders to protect their rights from upstream, purify the source, and root out infringing products;Strengthen the publicity of intellectual property rights for small businesses;Reform the assessment system for judges.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117