登记制转型中的立案庭发展进路  

The DevelopmentalPath of the Litigation Court in the Transformation of Registration System

作　　者：刘帅 LIU Shuai(The High-tech Zone People's Court,Taian,Shandong,Taian271000,China)

机构地区：[1]山东省泰安市高新技术产业开发区人民法院,山东泰安271000

出　　处：《济宁学院学报》2020年第3期43-49,共7页Journal of Jining University

摘　　要：为解决“立案难”的问题,我国法院分别在1997年和2015年进行了“立审分立”和“立案登记”两次影响深远的改革。在这两次改革中,人民法院立案庭经历了从无到有、发展定型再到面临考验的各个历史阶段。所谓“立案难”在不同的历史时期有其各自的特点及成因,应当从不同的侧面予以深度认知,其中经济社会急剧变革和发展是一条主线脉络。在立案登记制的背景下,立案庭经受着来自外部舆论和内部监管的双重压力,倒逼机制若想充分发挥作用必须以尊重客观司法规律为前提。在案件登记审查功能之外,立案庭仍需整合优化,保障审判执行主业、实质性纠纷化解和服务法院监管决策等多项功能。In order to solve the problem of"difficulty in filing a case",Chinese courts carried out two far-reaching reforms of"separation of trial"and"filing a case"in 1997 and 2015 respectively.In these two reforms,the people's court has gone through the whole process from nothing to being established,from developing to being tested.The so-called"difficulty to file a case"has its own characteristics and causes in different historical periods,which should be deeply recognized from different aspects,among which the rapid economic and social transformation and development are a main thread.Under the background of case-filing system,the court is under the double pressure of external public opinion and internal supervision.In order to make full use of the counter-force mechanism,we must respect the objective law of justice.In addition to the function of case registration and examination,the court still needs to integrate and optimize several functions,such as guaranteeing the main business of trial execution,resolving substantive disputes and serving the supervision and decision-making of the court.

关 键 词：登记制 立案庭 立案难 立审分立 立案登记 

分 类 号：D921.1[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]