数据安全视角下Iaas模式云服务商版权责任研究--以阿里云版权侵权案为例  

Research on Copyright Liability of Cloud Server Provider in Iaas Mode from the Perspective of Data Security——A Case of Copyright Infringement of Alibaba Cloud

作　　者：王渊[1] Wang Yuan(School of Law,Lanzhou University,Lanzhou 730000,China)

机构地区：[1]兰州大学法学院,甘肃兰州730000

出　　处：《中国科技论坛》2020年第8期60-66,共7页Forum on Science and Technology in China

基　　金：2018年度教育部人文社会科学研究项目“恶意知识产权侵权警告立法规制的最简方案研究”(18XJA820002);兰州大学“双一流”引导专项:拔尖创新人才培养(561319901)。

摘　　要：用户租用云服务商的服务器存储数据(Iaas模式)侵犯版权时,云服务商是否适用“避风港”规则并承担版权侵权责任?阿里云案一审判决及一些学者认为适用,但二审判决及一些学者认为不适用。云服务商没有提供“信息存储空间”,如果让云提供商按照“避风港”规则审查、删除数据,否则承担间接侵权责任,将会影响数据安全,加重云服务商的责任,阻碍大数据及云计算技术的进一步发展。只有在确保数据安全及遵循利益平衡原则下,采用并完善诉前禁令制度,规定云服务商协助禁令执行,缩小云服务商的间接侵权责任范围,才能维护云服务商、版权人和用户的三方利益。When users infringe copyright in renting servers provided by cloud computing service providers to save data(Iaas Mode),whether service providers should apply to“safe haven”rule and bear copyright infringement liability?The first trial of Alibaba Cloud case and a number of scholars believe that is applicable,while second judgment and some scholars oppose it.When service provider does not provide“information storage space”,it also bears indirect liability,which will affect the data security,increase responsibility of cloud computing server providers,and hinder the further development of Big Data and Cloud computing technology.Only in the situation of insuring data security and following the principle of benefit balance,adopting and improving the system of temporary restraining order,stipulating service providers to assist the execution of restraining order,reducing the scope of indirect infringement liability of server providers,consequently the tripartite interests of service providers,copyright owners and users can be maintained.

关 键 词：数据安全 Iaas模式 云服务商 版权责任 

分 类 号：DF523.1[政治法律—民商法学]