检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈景信 Chen Jingxin(Guangdong Academy of Decision Science,Sun Yat-sen University,Guangzhou 510275,China)
机构地区:[1]中山大学广东决策科学研究院,广东广州510275
出 处:《中国科技论坛》2020年第8期110-118,158,共10页Forum on Science and Technology in China
基 金:国家社会科学基金项目(13CMZ038);广东省特色重点学科“公共管理”建设项目(F2017STSZD01);2019年度中山大学高校基本科研业务费青年教师培育项目(19wkpy25)。
摘 要:基于创业数量和创业质量视角,本文构建包含成业绩效、增长绩效和就业绩效3个维度的评价指标体系,同时使用PCA-TOPSIS模型对2008—2016年省域创业绩效进行测度,并重点从创业绩效的时序变化和区域差异视角展开分析。研究表明:考察期内大多数省(市、区)创业绩效呈波动上升趋势,东部地区省份排名比较稳定;四大经济区域的区际创业绩效差距明显,并且呈现“东中西依次递减,东北地区穿插其中”这一典型的经济地理特征。这一结果为地区创业政策措施的制定和区域创业的协调发展提供了客观依据。From the perspective of entrepreneurial quantity and quality,this paper constructs an evaluation index system including establishment performance,growth performance and employment performance,and uses a PCA-TOPSIS model to measure the provincial entrepreneurial performance from 2008 to 2016.Then it analyzes the measurement results from the perspective of time series change and spatial difference.The results show that most of the provincial entrepreneurial performance is fluctuating upward in the period of study,the eastern provinces are more stable in the ranking,the regional entrepreneurial performance gap in the four economic regions is obvious,which shows typical economic geographical features of“The East,the Central and the West are decreasing in turn,and the Northeast is interspersed with them”.This results provide an objective basis for the formulation of entrepreneurship policy measures in regions and the coordinated development of regional entrepreneurship.
关 键 词:省域 创业绩效 时序变化 PCA-TOPSIS模型
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249