融贯性在法律推理理论中的作用与价值  

The Role and Value of Coherence in Theories of Legal Reasoning

作　　者： 邢焱鹏(译) 方新军(校)[2] Maksymilian Del Mar;Xing Yan-peng

机构地区：[1]伦敦玛丽女王大学 [2]苏州大学王健法学院

出　　处：《苏州大学学报（法学版）》2020年第3期150-160,共11页Journal of Soochow University：Law Edition

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重大项目“民法典解释的社会主义核心价值观融入研究”(19VHJ011)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：融贯性理论的首要目的是为法律推理提供另一个视角。就融贯性在法律推理中的作用而言,麦考密克主张的是一种弱融贯论。融贯性属于麦考密克所说的“二次证明”,二次证明必须对相互对立的两个规则进行三次检验,继而再判断规则的一致性、融贯性和效力性。法律规则层面的融贯性和一致性需要持续关注法律与融贯的基本价值体系的联系,但麦考密克并没有清晰地阐明基于融贯性的论辩与实质正义是如何关联起来的,也从未缓和融贯性更大的作用与多元价值主义所信奉的元伦理之间的紧张关系。关系伦理学要求尊重对价值问题的合理分歧,既涉及合议庭的法官之间的关系、法官与辩护人之间的关系,也涉及法官与各方当事人之间的关系。The chief motivation driving the proposal of coherence theories of law is to offer an alternative view about the scope of reason in law.In terms of the role of coherence in legal reasoning,MacCormick’s theory is a weak theory of coherence.Coherence belongs to what MacCormick called second-order justification,including three tests,which are applied to each of the two possible rulings,and then used to decide between them:consistency,coherence,and consequences.Coherence and consistency at the level of rules of law depends upon a continued concern to relate the law to a coherent underlying system of values.MacCormick did not quite make clear the way in which coherence-based arguments were connected to substantive justice.The tension between a greater role for coherence and the meta-ethical commitment to pluralism about value is also not ever quite resolved.Relational ethics,namely,respect for reasonable disagreement about matters of value,attaches to both the relations between the judges on a panel,as well as to the relations between the judges and the parties coming before them.

关 键 词：融贯性 价值多元主义 法律推理 关系伦理学 

分 类 号：DF0[政治法律—法学理论]