检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:彭笑杰 PENG Xiaojie(Hebei Xingtai Hydrological Survey and Research Center,Xingtai 054000,China)
机构地区:[1]河北省邢台水文勘测研究中心,河北邢台054000
出 处:《水科学与工程技术》2020年第4期15-17,共3页Water Sciences and Engineering Technology
摘 要:目前应用较广泛的水质评价方法有单因子评价法、水污染指数法、综合水质标识指数法、人工神经网络法、模糊综合评价法等,其中人工神经网络法、模糊综合评价法操作复杂,对评价人员素质要求较高,且适用面偏窄,选取前三种评价方法对朱庄水库、野沟门水库2018年度水质情况进行评价,并对比分析三种评价方法的区别,探讨分别适用的水体情况。At present,the widely used water evaluation methods include single factor evaluation method,water pollution index method,comprehensive water quality identification index method,artificial neural network method,fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method,etc.The operation of artificial neural network method and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method is complex,which requires high quality of evaluation personnel and the application area of the two methods is narrow.Therefore,the first three evaluation methods are selected in this paper to evaluate the water quality of Zhuzhuang reservoir and Yegoumen reservoir in 2018.The differences of the three evaluation methods will be compared and analyzed to explore the applicable water conditions.
分 类 号:X824[环境科学与工程—环境工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3