检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李星[1] Li Xing
机构地区:[1]大连海事大学法学院
出 处:《学术前沿》2020年第14期96-99,共4页Frontiers
摘 要:法律渊源作为被普遍使用甚至专门研究的一个法律概念,其内涵与外延却高度不确定。究其原因,法律渊源概念阐释存在历史差异和法系差异,并不存在一种固定不变的真理性界定。因此,法律渊源概念阐释必须立足中国法治背景,回归中国法治现实,在中国法治语境下开展,具体应当采纳立法主导型的立法与司法互动立场,制定法主导的适度多元的外延定位,以及功能主义的法律渊源研究方法转向。As a legal concept widely used or even specially studied,le gal origin has a highly uncertain connotation and extension.The reason is that there are historical and legal differences in the interpretation of the concept of legal origin as it does not have a fixed or "truthful" definition.Therefore,it must be based on the background of China’s rule of law,return to the reality of China’s rule of law,and be carried out in the context of China’s rule of law.In detail,we should adopt the position of legislative and judicial interaction dominated by legislation,stick to the moderate and diverse extension orientation dominated by statute laws,and make a shift toward functionalist research methods for legal origin.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222