以历史学为方法:再论内藤湖南的东洋史研究  

Taking History as a Method:Naito Konan’s Study of Oriental History

作　　者：黄艳 陈阳 HUANG Yan;CHEN Yang

机构地区：[1]长春师范大学历史文化学院,130032 [2]长春师范大学图书馆,130032

出　　处：《历史教学问题》2020年第4期81-88,166,共9页History Research And Teaching

基　　金：吉林省教育厅“十三五”社会科学基金项目(吉教科文合字[2016]第393号)的结项成果。

摘　　要：内藤湖南东洋史研究各论说间密切配合,形成一种清晰可辨的论说结构。其历史观以"东洋文化"的建构为基础,在"东洋文化"的场域里,肯定中国文化的价值;描绘中国和日本历史发展的部分特征从而提出"文化中心移动说";以促进"东洋文化"发展的视角论证日本"天职"的历史正当性;着眼于"东洋文化"变迁大势提出"东洋史时代三区分说"和"宋代近世说"。内藤以历史学方法在不同层面为其现实主张建构论证体系,是其人其说的显然特点。The viewpoints in Naito Konan’s Oriental history are coherent enough to form a complete doctrine.Based on the idea of"oriental culture",Naito affirmed the value of Chinese culture,and put forward the hypothesis of"the shift of the cultural center".He argued that"Japan’s mission"was historically justified in order to promote the progress of the"oriental culture".According to the changing"oriental culture",he again raised the ideas like"three periods of Oriental History"and"China’s modern period starting from the Song Dynasty".It is obvious that Naito Konan took history as a method to construct his argument for his purposes.

关 键 词：内藤湖南 东洋文化 历史 日本的“天职” 

分 类 号：K091[历史地理—历史学]