心理测试结论证据资格问题研究  

Study of the Admissibility of Polygraph Evidence

作　　者：袁国强 Yuan Guoqiang(Political Academy Xi’an Campus,National Defense University of People’s Liberation Army,Xi’an 710068,China)

机构地区：[1]国防大学政治学院军队保卫工作系军队刑事侦查教研室,陕西西安710068

出　　处：《铁道警察学院学报》2020年第2期79-86,共8页Journal of Railway Police College

摘　　要：心理测试技术诞生以来,在世界很多国家都有丰富的司法实践,然而关于心理测试结论的证据资格问题却仁者见仁、智者见智。心理测试结论拥有独特的证据价值,虽然其在我国司法领域应用已经非常广泛,但至今没有获得证据资格,症结在于心理测试符合证据规则的标准体系尚未建构起来,没能解决可重复性短板制约测试结论满足证据基本属性的问题,对此,需要用与时俱进的理念自上而下地统筹部署,通过规范影响测试结论的条件因素和程序方法,推动心理测试结论实质性地进入庭审质证。Since the emergence of polygraph technology,it has been frequently used in judicial practice of many countries,though the admissibility of polygraph test as evidence is disputable.The polygraph test results provide unique values of proof,which are widely used in Chinese judicial practice,though inadmissible as evidence for the standard system of polygraph test in accordance with the rules of evidence is not yet built.It can not solve the defect of capricious results and does not comply with the basic properties of evidence.Therefore,measures should be taken from the top level as the call of time by normalizing the influence factors and procedural methods which may affect the polygraph test results.Thus the polygraph evidence can be substantially used in trial cross-examination.

关 键 词：心理测试结论 证据资格 证据规则 标准体系 

分 类 号：D918[政治法律—法学]