论辩对印度因明和中国名辩学的意义  

The Significance of Argumentation to Indian Classical Logic and Chinese Logic

作　　者：王李蟠 王全权[1] 王克喜[2] Wang Lipan;Wang Quanquan;Wang Kexi

机构地区：[1]南京林业大学人文学院,江苏南京210037 [2]南京大学哲学系,江苏南京210032

出　　处：《河南社会科学》2020年第8期107-112,共6页Henan Social Sciences

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目“因明与名辩学比较研究”(15BZX082);国家社会科学基金重大项目“八卷本《中国逻辑史》”(14ZDB013)。

摘　　要：治中国逻辑史的学者更多关注语言、数学、政治制度等对中国逻辑产生和发展的影响,而对论辩在因明和名辩学产生和发展中的作用和影响关注不够充分。对比论辩在因明与名辩学产生和发展中的作用、实际论辩情况以及对因明与中国古代逻辑发展的走向等方面,就相关问题展开探讨,以供研究中国逻辑史和因明提供一种新的研究范式。While researchers of Chinese history of logic pay more attention to the influence of language,mathematics,and political systems on the emergence and development of Chinese logic,they do not pay enough attention to the role and influence of argumentation in the emergence and development of Indian classical logic and Chinese logic.By comparing the role of argumentation in the emergence and development of Indian classical logic and Chinese logic,the actual debate,and the trend of Indian classical logic and ancient Chinese logic,the present article discusses related issues and provides a research paradigm for future studies in this field.

关 键 词：论辩 因明 名辩学 

分 类 号：B81-0[哲学宗教—逻辑学]